America Reimagined

The past 50 years of our contradictory politics has been a decades-long period of missed opportunities for the United States. Politically, we have swung from one extreme to the other without much in the way of vision or direction, falling further and further into this partisan quagmire of blame and greed that we find ourselves in. 

As a country we are floundering, forced to choose between a Democratic party full of emotional wokeness and celebrity endorsements and lacking gravitas, and a Republican party intent on a fascist path of social control and willing to steal from the poor, the sick, and the elderly to give to the wealthy. What a terrible choice.

This is the darkest of times for this country. The Supreme Court, the Congress, and the Presidency have joined together in a sort of unholy Trinity to create a government that is full of people who took an oath to uphold the Constitution but have chosen to break their oath and their promises, all in allegiance to one man who is angry, threatening, full of vengeance, delusional, and lacking in basic human emotions such as empathy, tolerance, and compassion. A man who controls by fear is not a leader but a tyrant, and that is what we have now.

History will record this year – 2025 – as the nadir of the United States. This year will become an example of how a democracy can fail if its people are no longer able to think for themselves but instead seize upon simplistic slogans, cheer empty rhetoric, and act out of fear. It is not that a democracy fails its people, it is that a people fail their democracy. 

And right now, we Americans are failing our democracy. 

Perhaps we are not yet ready to admit to ourselves that we as a country have lost our collective way. 

Perhaps we need to allow the current administration to close down newspapers and media outlets, criminalize dissent, jail its political opponents, fire a hundred thousand workers, deport hundreds of thousands of our neighbors, fill the streets of major cities with a permanent military presence, pollute our land and our water and our air with industrial waste and toxic gases, declare martial law and suspend the mid-term elections, and watch as the most vulnerable of us are left to suffer while the most wealthy among us drink champagne and eat faux gras and caviar and black truffles on their mega-yachts.

At some point we will have to choose to either let our democratic ideals go and surrender our personal freedoms or to stand up and fight to regain what once made us a great nation. Each one of us must make our own choice. Woke or Maga, it all comes down to whether you value your ideology more than the future of our country.

If we are true patriots, the choice is clear. We fight. We fight to make America great again.

This is not about supporting one man or one party. The stakes are too high to limit our sights so low.

All of us should read the Declaration of Independence slowly and carefully to understand why this country was founded. All of us should read the Constitution with all of its Amendments to understand how our government is structured and what our rights are as Americans.

These documents are the foundation of our country and its people. Our government does not seem to take these documents seriously anymore, but we the people should. Perhaps then we will elect better politicians, politicians who will preserve our rights instead of ignoring them.

What must be done to return the United States to being the greatest democracy in the world?

WE MUST ELIMINATE INCOME INEQUALITY

We live in a capitalist society that benefits very few of us. Statistics on income vary, but the following is close enough to illustrate the point. 50% of individual Americans make less than $55,000 per year. 90% of individual Americans make less than $250,000 per year. 95% of individual Americans make less than $350,000 per year. The median salary/compensation of corporate CEOs is over $16,000,000 per year. 

Corporate CEOs make 290 times as much than those Americans at the 50% percentile. Corporate CEOs make nearly 50 times as much as those at the 95% percentile. Corporate CEOs make 500 times more than a family of four who have a poverty-level income of $32,000 per year.

Corporate CEOs are only part of the problem. There are many even more insidious ways that society loses wealth to those who are smart and clever and have figured out how to skim from the financial system without adding anything of real and lasting value to it. Not to mention those who take advantage of various tax laws and provisions and utilize imaginative accounting practices that allow their wealth to be secreted away.

This extraordinarily unbalanced accumulation of wealth in the hands of a few people is a fundamental problem in our society. It has become a corruptive and controlling influence throughout our political system.

This is why we still have poor people in this country. This is why we still have people that go hungry in this country. This is why people have to work two or more jobs in this country. This is why we have a cost of housing crisis in this country. This is why we have deteriorating roads and bridges and other infrastructure in this country. This is why we have lost our manufacturing base in this country. This is why we have such a high and increasing federal debt in this country. 

The wealth that society needs to address all these issues is here in this country and continues to be generated every year by those 95% of Americans that make less than $350,000 per year. 

The problem is that the rich and powerful and influential people in our society are skimming all of this wealth for themselves. They did not earn it, they do not deserve it, they just take it, and the rest of us just let them do it, year after year.

The Achilles heel of capitalism is greed, and it has been destroying this country one dollar at a time.

WE MUST ELIMINATE ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION

This country benefits tremendously from legal immigration and the presence of guest workers.

Legal immigration brings highly motivated people to this country, many of whom come with important skills. Legal immigration helps to stabilize our aging population, bringing more workers into the Social Security and Medicare systems and helping to keep these programs solvent. New and different cultures enrich the American culture with new traditions, new cuisines, new ways of thinking. 

With the exception of our indigenous population, our country is made up of immigrants that came from other nations to become Americans. The number of legal immigrants entering this country has averaged approximately 1.5 million people per year for the last decade or so. This is an immigration rate that is manageable given the resources needed to process and absorb these new arrivals into the country. There is no reason why this American tradition should not continue.

Guest workers, including those who are in this country without benefit of legal status, provide necessary labor to perform important and often under-valued work in a variety of industries including construction, landscaping, childcare, eldercare, hospitality services, crop harvesting, and the processing of fish, poultry, and meat. Much of this work would not be able to be done without these guest workers. 

The problem with the current system is that too many of these workers are not of legal status and are vulnerable to exploitation by their employers. Guest workers would benefit by being of legal status and being provided with basic protections such as a minimum guest worker wage, standard working hours, and basic health care. In exchange, the continued availability of a less-expensive guest worker labor pool would be of benefit to employers, who would otherwise have to pay more for American and Green Card labor if they could even find such people willing to perform this type of work.

Individuals who hold student visas or visitor’s visas must be prepared to return to their country of origin following graduation or completion of their visit unless they have found employment with someone who will legally sponsor them and allow them to obtain a work visa as a registered guest worker. As a general rule, those who do not leave on their own accord in accordance with the terms of their visas must be deported. 

Illegal aliens living in this country for a period of time, e.g. 10 years, who have been productive members of their community and have not committed felonies during this time, should be given an opportunity to become a registered guest worker. Their children should be eligible to apply for and be granted citizenship once they become of age.

There is a major problem with the millions of illegal aliens who entered the southern border of this country during the past four years, and who are now residing in this country without legal status.

All illegal aliens who entered this country, requested political asylum, and were given a notice to appear for an asylum hearing must honor their hearing. If asylum is denied, they must leave voluntarily or be deported, unless they have found employment with someone who will legally sponsor them and allow them to obtain a work visa as a registered guest worker. Any illegal alien who does not return to honor their hearing must be deported once found.  

Any illegal alien who requested political asylum and has it granted following their hearing should be eligible for a Green Card.

All illegal aliens who entered this country illegally and evaded capture by the border patrol are unlikely to be here to live a peaceful, law-abiding life. Once found, they must all be deported.

Border security must be improved, to include completing the southern border wall to fill in gaps and to provide enhanced electronic monitoring of activity along and underneath the wall. At some time in the future, it is hoped that the border wall will no longer be necessary, but for now it is clearly an important check on illegal immigration, drug smuggling, and human trafficking.

America already accepts more legal immigrants than any other country. As we have seen, there is a maximum rate of immigrant entry that this country is able to absorb in an orderly, humane and controlled manner. This rate was far exceeded during the past four years, and this has caused many problems – both financial and social – that continue to burden this country in many ways. 

This cannot be allowed to happen again. Control of our own borders is our right and our responsibility as a nation and as a people.

WE MUST CHOOSE TO BUY WHAT WE MAKE

There is much talk about returning manufacturing jobs to this country. Is this a good idea or a bad idea?

It is pointed out, probably by those who have a vested interest in the current system of importing essentially everything, that domestic production of goods will result in higher prices to the American consumer. It is pointed out that there are currently manufacturing jobs that are going unfilled, and that more manufacturing in this country means that there will be more manufacturing jobs that will go unfilled. It is pointed out that American-made products will never be able to compete in the international marketplace due to this country’s higher cost of production. 

All that being said, Americans once made everything that Americans needed before corporations sold out America by off shoring our domestic manufacturing, primarily to China. There is no reason why Americans cannot begin to make what Americans need once again.

There are some products that are fundamental to our way of life that we cannot allow China to continue to control. Pharmaceuticals, for example, raw materials for high-tech and defense applications, for another. These critical products and materials must be made and sourced domestically or obtained from our closest and most trusted allies. Publicly accusing our allies of decades of unfair trading practices followed by punitive tariffs is not a particularly effective approach when it comes to obtaining their cooperation, but our allies know that there will eventually be a more reasonable American administration to deal with. 

There are other products that could certainly be manufactured here, but this will require significant capital investment. These aforementioned tariffs seem to be encouraging investment in this country, as well as resulting in some shifting of production back to domestic plants. This needs to continue, but at an accelerated rate.

Once manufacturing plants are built and up and running, there are likely to be thousands of foreign-born workers who have obtained guest worker status that would be available to work in these plants. 

The real question is whether Americans will be able to afford the higher priced, domestically produced products being designed and manufactured by Americans and registered American guest workers. This is why the existing level of income inequality needs to be addressed. Simply put, Americans have to make more money to be able to afford to buy what we produce. 

There are many brilliant designers and creative engineers and others here in this country who would love to be able to use their expertise to make products that are of the highest quality and also produced in newly imagined, cost-effective ways. Right now, corporate America gives them no opportunity to do so.

In order for America to become great again, Americans must choose to buy American. First, however, we have to commit to making things again.  

WE MUST EMBRACE SUSTAINABILITY

There used to be this quaint concept of durable goods. Everything made in America used to be a durable good. Things were purpose made to last indefinitely, designed to be repairable instead of designed to be disposable. Where we once had local dumps, we now have regional landfills, ocean depositories, and container ships full of garbage destined for underdeveloped countries. 

We have become a society that imports things with the intention of throwing them away instead of making things with the intention of passing them down to the next generation. Instead of being wasteful and irresponsible consumers of the latest trendy, shiny objects, we would be much better off being champions of sustainability. So would the planet and everything else that lives here with us.

Sustainability means living in a mindful manner that uses resources in a way that can continue for an indefinite period of time without damaging the environment and stealing from future generations. 

Some examples of sustainable practices:

  • Using crop rotation to improve farmland soil instead of applying massive amounts of fertilizer every year.
  • Using textiles made from naturally derived biodegradable cotton, wool, linen, silk, and bamboo instead of man-made textiles made from non-biodegradable polyester, nylon, and acrylic.
  • Using naturally derived leather for clothing, accessories, and furniture instead of vinyl-based fabric.
  • Using tools and appliances designed to be repaired and manufactured to provide a twenty-five-year minimum performance life instead of tools and appliances that are unable to be repaired and are designed to break from normal use after a few years.
  • Using cellulose-based biodegradable packaging materials instead of plastic bags, plastic air-filled cushions, and Styrofoam peanuts and panels, none of which are biodegradable and do not lend themselves to recycling.
  • Making recycling and composting programs mandatory so as to minimize the quantity of consumer and industrial waste that would otherwise end up in landfills. 
  • Requiring manufacturers to use a percentage of recycled materials instead of virgin materials in their manufacturing processes.
  • Generating as much electricity as possible from solar, wind, and tidal energy sources, avoiding the burning of coal, oil, and natural gas so that these resources can be reserved for more valuable uses.

The United States has more people than all other countries except China and India. If we are able to live in a sustainable manner, minimizing our resource requirements and our negative impact on the environment, this will be a profound statement as to what is possible even in larger economies.

WE MUST STRENGTHEN OUR ALLIANCES

The world has never been as peaceful and as prosperous as it was under the world order created by the United States after World War II. We are now in a period where resentful, extremist, and ambitious nations want to eliminate this world order for their own benefit. We cannot control these dark forces, but we must do everything we can to defend ourselves against them.

One of the best ways to do so is to strengthen our political, economic, and strategic alliances with like-minded nations. Unilaterally imposing tariffs on other countries because of their perceived decades-long exploitation of our relatively open markets is not the way to improve our international standing in the world. The damage from this administration’s ill-conceived actions has already been done, but this damage can be mitigated over time with a different approach.

Our political and economic relationships with other countries should be evaluated by our government on an individual country-by-country basis. Our relationships should be evaluated constantly, reviewed annually, and adjusted as necessary to achieve the best relationships possible. Our relationships should never be taken for granted.  

The intent should be to establish mutually beneficial relationships that focus on positive outcomes, are respectful of differences in cultures and political systems, and establish friendships between the United States and other nations as equal partners. Coercion, manipulation, and interference in the internal workings of other countries should never be part of this country’s foreign policy. 

It has become evident over the past several years that the United States is no longer able to unilaterally police the world and act as peacemaker wherever there is conflict. We need support and assistance from other countries to do so.

The next several decades are destined to be a period in which China becomes ever more dominant before it stagnates due to its falling birthrate and aging population. China’s ongoing military research, development, and rapid expansion is both threatening and disappointing. The extent of China’s military and economic domination can only be countered by strong alliances that support a world order where sovereign boundaries are respected, free and fair trade is practiced, and cultures can interact in a way that results in greater appreciation of one another. 

The rise of imperial Russia is destined to fail because of its internal corruption, a lack of a viable economy that can take part in international trade, and a shrinking population. However, as long as Vladimir Putin is Russia’s dictator, weapons of war and war itself will continue to be Russia’s main exports.  Hopefully Vladimir Putin will die before he is able to carry out his threats of nuclear conflict.

No matter how much we may wish to believe that this is one world, that we are all one people, and that somehow we can achieve lasting world peace, the reality is that the tribal nature of humans and our willingness to be led by aggressive and ruthless men means that vigilance and strength will continue to be absolute requirements for the foreseeable future.

Alliances bring more vigilance and more strength to all who are in them. Their critical importance should never be underestimated, they should never be taken for granted, and, above all, they must never be abandoned. 

WE MUST BECOME HAPPIER AND HEALTHIER

The happiest countries in the world are Finland, Sweden, the Netherlands, Norway, and Denmark. The United States does not even make the top 20. 

The healthiest countries in the world are Norway, Switzerland, Finland, Australia, and Sweden. Again, the United States does not even make the top 20.

Why is this? If we would like to be a happier and healthier country, would it not make sense to study what these other countries are doing that the United States is not? 

Unfortunately, Americans are generally under the assumption that we can’t learn anything from other countries, that the American way is the best way, and that to think otherwise is to be unpatriotic, anti-American, even traitorous. 

Well, this way of thinking has not been working very well for us Americans, has it? 

There are several obvious reasons why Americans are not that happy and not that healthy. 

We have a much greater economic disparity between the richest and the poorest of us. Common sense tells us that the poorer we are, the more unhappy and unhealthy we will be. There are many of us who live in quiet desperation, stressed out from working more than one job, not having enough money to buy healthy food, and not having ready access to health care. These people bring down our overall happiness and healthiness scores. There is a tendency among many of us to ignore these people and wish that they would go away, but they are us. 

In addition, Americans work more hours, with a poorer work/life balance. Americans are too sedentary and do not exercise enough. Americans eat more processed food and too much of it. Americans pay to support a medical system that prioritizes profit over helping people to be healthy.

Also, we are out of step with the rhythm of life. Too many Americans rely on external stimulus to fill their lives. We are constantly bombarded with sales pitches, infomercials, internet influencers, social media, podcasts, and other stimuli that requires limited involvement from us. We watch reality TV and live vicariously through others instead of actively engaging ourselves and enriching our own lives. No wonder we have such a high level of depression, such a high level of mental illness, and such a high level of suicide. 

Much of what makes us unhappy and unhealthy has been institutionalized into our government and our economy and has become socially accepted as perfectly normal and perfectly American. Income disparity, excessive work hours, a reliance on overly processed food, unaffordable prescriptions, a consumption-based economy – these things are going to be difficult to change because they are very profitable for the powerful economic and political interests that control and define our lives. 

We all need to reconsider what is truly important to us. As a whole, we should look to those countries where people are happier and healthier than we are and learn from them. As individuals, we should concentrate on ourselves, our family, our friends, our faith, our lives away from work, and not be in such a hurry to react to the latest trends or sensationalized dramas. We have allowed too much nonsense to dictate the way we live our lives. 

There is a quaint, old-fashioned saying – “stop and smell the roses.” No one smells the roses anymore.

Figuratively speaking, whatever our individual rose garden, we should be actively tending to it. If we don’t have a rose garden of our own, we should plant one. 

WE MUST PREPARE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EXTREMES

The past decade has seen an increase in the number and magnitude of extreme weather events, many of which have affected areas of the country that were previously thought to be safe. Fewer and fewer parts of the country are immune from the destructive effects of floods, tornadoes, forest fires, hurricanes, earthquakes, mudslides, tsunamis, and rising sea levels.

We have seen the extent of property damage, displacement of families, destruction of entire communities, and loss of life that extreme environmental events can cause. Our traditional insurance industry as it currently exists is increasingly overwhelmed by the cost of major environmental disasters and has begun to refuse to provide coverage in the areas of the country that are the worst affected. Much of our infrastructure such as roads, bridges, the electrical grid, and potable water supplies is increasingly unable to withstand these types of extreme weather events. 

It is not a long-term answer to simply provide emergency assistance and low-interest loans to rebuild what has already been damaged, only to experience similar destructive events a short time later. There needs to be a concerted effort to harden our buildings and infrastructure to withstand these extreme weather events. 

It is all too easy to blame FEMA for a slow response and an unwillingness to provide adequate funds for disaster relief, but state and local governments are not equipped to do much more than to provide emergency rescue services and make temporary infrastructure repairs. 

A comprehensive study of weather trends is needed to predict where future extreme environmental events are likely to take place. Revisions to building codes must be made to ensure that new structures are built in a manner that will provide the best survivability to extreme events when they occur. Older structures should be retrofitted with newer technologies to the greatest practical extent. Passive barriers such as fire breaks, levees, drainage tunnels, detention reservoirs, and similar measures need to be constructed in anticipation of need.

Whether naturally occurring or man-made, extreme environmental events appear to be our new reality. instead of placing blame on people and organizations after the damage has been done and loss of life has occurred, it would be far more constructive to take measures ahead of time to improve our ability to minimize damage and loss of life.  

WE MUST BECOME A MORE CIVILIZED AND PERCEPTIVE PEOPLE 

A great many Americans find it acceptable to act in ways that show an ignorance of good manners, an inability to respect others, a willingness to insult and demean those with whom they disagree, and a selfishness of thought and action.

The current President and his administration have made a lack of civility into an art form where the disparagement of political opponents, judges, educators, lawyers, undocumented people, and others occurs on a daily basis. 

Social media platforms, alternative news sources, and podcasting commentators appear more than willing to criticize anyone in the harshest of terms, often in ways that are very cruel and personal. 

The sense of personal entitlement at the expense of others has been made into a virtue by self-proclaimed influencers, and manifests itself in rudeness in stores, in restaurants, on our roads, and on airplanes. What was once considered unacceptable behavior has become commonplace and is often glorified and applauded instead of being rejected outright as a cancerous, negative influence on our society.

Our lack of perceptiveness and critical thinking is equally troubling. A great many Americans are easily manipulated in their thinking by self-proclaimed experts, commentators, influencers, and others who present their opinions as facts. Why anyone would prefer to let others tell them what to think instead of developing their own opinions and drawing their own conclusions makes no sense. 

It is remarkable and quite sad that fact-based history and science are so readily disputed by influential people who have no actual expertise to support their claims and opinions. Too many Americans are suspicious of the educated, distrustful of science, and dismissive of history, yet are so willing to believe theories that have no basis in fact and belie common sense.

Being skeptical of what people say is always a smart thing to do, particularly when what people say is in direct contradiction to conventional wisdom and reality. Just because someone speaks passionately and authoritatively about something does not mean that they are correct. Each of us has the right and the obligation to have our own opinion, to carefully consider the various sides of issues, and to demand substantiation of claims and allegations.

Unfortunately, the ability to logically think things through is a skill that must be learned and developed. This is called critical thinking, and it used to be an accepted part of our educational curriculum. 

We should all be making a commitment to educating ourselves so that we avoid being foolish and ill-informed. This applies to the farmer and the laborer and the tradesman just as much as it does to the teacher and the lawyer and the financier. Ignorance and closemindedness exist in all walks of life. 

There are too many Americans who prefer a life of simple ignorance and superstition instead of a more challenging life of thoughtfulness.  Making America Great Again requires that Americans be independent thinkers and not be so willing to be told what to think, and then told what to do.

WE MUST EMBRACE OUR DIFFERENCES

With a few important exceptions, this country of ours is made up of people who chose to come here from someplace else. The exceptions to this being our indigenous peoples, who were already here, and the people forced to come here as slaves. Every wave of immigrants from a different part of the world has been mistreated by those who came before and have had to fight for the right to be equal members of society. 

It is long past time to stop fighting amongst ourselves and to be more tolerant of one another. History has shown that, sooner or later, every group is assimilated into the greater American society. Too much time is spent fighting the inevitable, because everyone eventually ends up belonging. We end up realizing that we all have the same aspirations – to be left alone to live our lives as we see fit, to be able to practice our faith, to raise our families, to pursue life, liberty and happiness without a sense of fear and foreboding. 

There are those among us who are haters and manipulators and self-serving agitators who do not want us to get along, and we must be smarter about recognizing them for who they are and rejecting their messages of divisiveness.

Our differences are what defines us as a society and as a country. Our differences have been a cause for division for decades, and this has weakened us at a time in our history that demands that we be strong. 

We must learn to embrace our differences for our common good and our common benefit. There has to be more give and take between us, more tolerance, more appreciation, more having each other’s backs.

WE MUST LIVE WITHIN OUR MEANS

This country has been living beyond its means for way too long. That is why the national debt is so high that the payment of the interest on the national debt is taking up nearly one-quarter of the country’s annual budget. 

Think of how many tangible improvements to our country are not being made due to this debt. Roads, bridges, airports, railways, ports, the energy grid, water infrastructure – all need long-overdue upgrading and expansion. Disaster preparedness, advances in agriculture and medicine and technology – much more needs to be done in these important areas. These are just a few examples of what is unable to be done because we cannot afford to do so.

Given that this country is the world’s richest, there is no justification for our current situation. The rest of the advanced nations of the world, as well as many Arab countries and China, have outpaced the United States for years. We are in a state of delusion and denial, brought about by decades of increasingly partisan politics and encouraged by the wealthiest among us who increasingly benefit at the expense of everyone else.

There is a problem with the Federal government spending too much money, to be sure, but there is also a problem with the Federal government not collecting enough money. Both problems need to be addressed if we are to have any hope of ending our addiction to deficit spending, let alone reducing our national debt. 

Federal expenditures should be made for critical programs that safeguard our land, air, and water, that support the poor, the disabled, and the elderly, that encourage research into science and technology and disease, and that protect us from enemies both foreign and domestic. We should be carefully evaluating the importance and the effectiveness of everything that is being funded by the Federal government and ending the funding for what is unimportant and ineffective instead of simplistically eliminating departments and programs and personnel based upon a specific ideology, only to realize their importance later.

The ongoing and simplistic elimination of 10% of the Federal workforce will make little difference in reducing the deficit. The number of Federal workers has remained constant for decades, but the deficit has tripled over this time. This means that the size of the Federal workforce is not the problem.

Waste, fraud, and abuse do exist, as does redundancy, and it must be the responsibility of all Federal agencies to identify and eliminate these costly practices as a primary objective. In addition, there are a multitude of unnecessary programs, grants and earmarks, all of which need to be eliminated in a thorough, systematic manner. 

There must be an annual review of all programs, grants, and other expenditures to ensure that monies spent are fully accounted for and anticipated/promised results are being achieved. This type of detailed financial oversight that leads to tangible action appears to be absent throughout the Federal government.

Addressing the revenue part of the financial equation is equally straightforward but will be much more difficult to achieve. The monies that are required to fund the necessary work of the Federal government can only be obtained from the people and organizations who possess and control the money, i.e., the wealthy and the large corporations. 

In the years before the Reagan administration, the highest personal Federal Tax rate was 70%. It is currently 37%. The highest corporate Federal Tax rate was 48%. It is currently 21%. Due to the number of special deductions, accelerated depreciation schedules, and other tax benefits – also known as loopholes – that from a practical perspective are available only to the wealthy and large corporations, the tax rates that these people and organizations pay are even lower.

The Reagan administration’s tax policies saw the national debt increase from $738 billion to $2.1 trillion. In the 36 years since, a period that essentially saw the Reagan administration’s tax policies stay in place, the national debt has increased to $36.2 trillion, approximately $1 trillion being added to the national debt each year. There appears to be a correlation between the increase in national debt and the change in tax policies instituted by the Reagan administration that benefited the wealthy and the large corporations.  

Unfortunately, the reconciliation bill just passed into law will prevent any significant increase in Federal revenue because the wealthy and large corporations retain their favorable tax status and avoid any increase. The reconciliation bill ensures that an additional $1 trillion will be added to the national debt for the remainder of President Trump’s term.

The idea that the U.S. economy can somehow be unleashed to grow at such a rate that the deficit will be reduced and then eliminated without any other action being taken is simply not true. This is nothing more than a self-serving falsehood being told by those who stand to profit from the elimination of regulations and economic safeguards that have been put in place to prevent economic and environmental disasters from occurring. 

Time and time again, the wealthy and the large corporations have been given opportunities to share in the wealth with the rest of society. From trickle-down economics during the Reagan administration to the corporate tax reductions during the first Trump administration, it is clear that the wealthy and the large corporations have no intention of sharing their wealth once it has been made. 

This forty-year period has seen a great transfer of wealth from the working class to the investment class. This same period has seen the end of the manufacturing and industrial capacity of this country in favor of imported goods that generate increased profit for investors. This has not been good for this country as a whole. The wealthy and the large corporations have not used their increased profits to benefit the working class, only to benefit themselves. This must end if this country is to live within its means. 

There needs to be a reversal of this wealth transfer so that wealth is returned to the working class in the form of higher taxes on the wealthy and large corporations. Higher wages for the working class will result in an increase in tax revenue as well. The overriding point is that Federal government revenue must be increased.

This will require a change in the Federal tax code, which will not be possible until the Democratic Party controls the Presidency and the two chambers of Congress. The Republican Party has shown quite clearly that full control of the government is the only means to achieve such an end.

Sad to say, but the Republican Party has once again shown itself to be the party of the wealthy and the large corporations. So much for its insistence that it is the party of fiscal responsibility and the party of the working people. 

In contrast, the United States has experienced its greatest periods of growth by far during Democratic administrations. The Democratic Party needs to be reminded of this as it tries to redefine itself. 

We all benefit when the country is being governed in a way that benefits all of us, not just a favored few of us.

WE MUST BECOME MORE SELF-RELIANT

Being self-reliant as a nation means being able to take care of our own needs instead of being dependent on other countries for the basic necessities of life and commerce. Right now, we are partially or fully dependent on other countries for food, clothing, pharmaceuticals, rare earth minerals, oil, machinery, steel, aluminum, and virtually all of our consumer products. At least one of these countries – China – is in no way a trustworthy trading partner and has demonstrated a willingness to engage in economic blackmail.

According to macro-economic theory, global efficiency dictates that products should be made where they can be made in the least expensive and most efficient way possible. Everyone will excel at their own specialty, so the theory goes, and all will benefit from each other’s efficiency and expertise.

In reality, this economic theory does not work. It assumes that there will be no trade barriers between countries, no tariffs, no government subsidies, no monopolistic practices. It ignores differences in standards of living, worker safety, worker benefits, and environmental concerns that exist between countries.

Given the opportunity and freedom to do so, businesses will always look to the cheapest sources of raw materials, labor, and even finished products, without regard to the interests of domestic labor, in this case the American worker. We have seen what decades of neglect and negligence regarding the interests of the American worker has brought about. The world’s greatest economy can produce next to nothing except an increasing number of multi-millionaires and billionaires. 

There has to be a way to begin to reverse this downward spiral, and it does not begin with taking money from the poorest, the oldest, and the most disadvantaged among us to give more to the multi-millionaires, the billionaires, and the large corporations. 

This country needs to learn from our economic adversaries, namely China, and do what they have done. Our government must use its economic, regulatory, and taxation powers to force the immediate domestic production of strategically critical products, the domestic sourcing of raw materials and rare earth minerals, and to institute the strongest of trade barriers and tariffs to block the importation of subsidized products.

In addition, we must recognize that direct government involvement in financing specific industrial projects to achieve self-reliance in critical industries is not socialism but common sense. Our capitalistic system is based upon investment in industries where return on investment is a primary and usually overriding consideration. Government investment can serve as a guarantor of financial stability in situations where investors would otherwise be unwilling to risk capital. Government investment is one means of fast-tracking critical projects when the private sector is reluctant to act.

We need to make economic self-sufficiency a primary focus of our government. Public investment when necessary will be critical if strategic self-sufficiency is to be achieved. We cannot shy away from this based upon ideologies that do not acknowledge real-world necessities.  

The threats facing this country are all too real. These threats must be faced head-on if we are to be successful in protecting ourselves from those who would take our wealth and our freedoms.

WE MUST PREPARE FOR WAR

For a brief time, the world was at peace, and all seemed well. We should have known better.

Now we see that the need for power and dominion, hatred and destruction, prejudice and greed – these terrible aspects of mankind never really went away. Their expression just became more nuanced and sophisticated, more clever, often still barbaric.

The tragedy in all of this is that most people everywhere are victims, innocent bystanders. The powerless among us suffer the most, usually at the whims and dictates of a sole leader or a ruling party, who are able to live a privileged life made possible by intimidation and violence.

We know the worst actors on the world stage – Vladimir Putin of Russia, Kim Jon-un of North Korea, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei of Iran, and Xi Jinping of China. The world can manage the first three, but the last poses an existential threat to a world order that believes in self-determination.

Consider this.  

Russia has a population of 146 million people. North Korea has a population of 27 million people. Iran has a population of 93 million people.

China has a population of 1,416 million people. 

China has over four times the population of the United States. That means four times the scientists, four times the technicians, four times the industrial capacity, four times the manufacturing capacity, four times the potential for world domination. 

There may come a time in the future when the Chinese people will have more self-determination and choose a way forward based upon peace and prosperity, but that is certainly not the case right now. The Chinese people are simply workers in the great Chinese Communist Party machine that has unofficially declared war on the West and is doing everything it can to become the dominant power in the world.

The magnitude of the single-minded assault on this country by the Chinese Communist Party is really breathtaking in its multi-pronged scope and long-term goals. Defending ourselves against this threat and taking strong and decisive action to mitigate the damage done should be the first priority of any administration, as well as being the first priority of our senators and representatives, but it clearly is not. 

Unlike the Chinese people, who have no choice but to support the efforts of the Chinese Communist Party in a unified effort, we have to choose to work together as the American people. Unfortunately, we have chosen to fight among ourselves, wasting decades on useless partisan bickering, ignoring clear signs of Chinese aggression, and listening to the American Civil Liberties Union argue for the rights of people who wish to do us harm.

For those who have forgotten, here is a brief list of the more egregious acts of undeclared war that China has committed in recent times:

  • Infiltrated Defense Department and Defense contractor computer networks and stole military technology that were then used to build advanced aircraft, missiles, aircraft carriers, submarines, and other weapons of war.
  • Purchased thousands of acres of farmland adjacent to domestic military bases to facilitate monitoring of military activities and potentially anti-personnel/anti-operations capabilities.
  • Developed biological weapons including the Covid-19 virus that was prematurely released, and more recently threatened to contaminate our food supply by attempting to smuggle into this country a fungus-based pathogen that could have decimated crops and sickened livestock.
  • Designed, built, and field-tested a naval vessel whose sole purpose is to sever undersea communications cables that allow western nations to communicate with one another.
  • Established policing stations in major American cities to monitor and control the activities of Chinese citizens living in this country.
  • Invested millions of dollars in prestigious U.S. universities so that Chinese nationals can attend the universities, be part of cutting-edge research, and then transmit the results back to China and the Chinese Communist Party.
  • Provided precursor chemicals and technical support to Mexican cartels to facilitate the manufacturing and importation of illegal fentanyl into the United States, resulting in hundreds of thousands of unnecessary deaths of Americans due to fentanyl poisoning.
  • Asserted ownership and control of virtually the entire South China Sea, rejecting the rights of other countries that share the South China Sea and rejecting the decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration that found China’s claims to be without merit.
  • Embarked on a massive shipbuilding program that will greatly expand its navy and allow projection of force throughout the world, overwhelming the U.S. Navy in the process.
  • Expanded its long-range hypersonic missile program in order to directly threaten Guam, Hawaii, Alaska, and other U.S. military bases, as well as allied nations in the Pacific region, with a first-strike destruction capability.
  • Purchased outright or obtained controlling interests in important American companies, taking advantage of the absence of any regulatory oversight over such purchases.
  • Used its Belt & Roads program to create debtor countries throughout the world, essentially forcing these countries to act in China’s best interests and not in the interests of their own people.
  • Monopolized various raw material supplies worldwide, including rare earth minerals, thereby allowing China to engage in economic blackmail.
  • Controlled the port facilities on either end of the Panama Canal, through which 40% of U.S. container traffic passes, with approximately 75% of the shipping through the Panama Canal originating from or destined to U.S. ports.

It is astonishing and infuriating that all of this has come to pass with so little action being taken by the United States to counteract these very threatening Chinese initiatives. 

Part of this is due to a lack of understanding of Chinese history and what its history says about its culture. 

Part of this is due to an attempt to rationalize Chinese actions from a Western perspective in order to avoid conflict or avoid being identified as anti-Chinese, i.e., being bigoted or racist. 

Part of this is a reluctance to regulate commercial business and investment practices, often times at the direction of American special interests that have placed profit over patriotism. 

Finally, part of this is basic geopolitical ignorance, vulnerability to special interests, or wanton disregard of hard facts on the part of our elected representatives.

In the face of overt and covert Chinese aggression, continuing to do essentially nothing would be tantamount to accepting that China is now the dominant power in the world. The U.S. will have essentially surrendered its position of global influence to China without realizing what has happened. Given the partisan nature of our current political discourse, and our overall unwillingness to confront China, this could very well happen.

This outcome should be unacceptable to Americans, but it may not be. Our character is not particularly strong and clear-eyed right now. Fewer and fewer of us are prepared to stand up and fight unless it is to fight among ourselves. We like to think that we are a strong country, but a country is only as strong as its people, and how strong are we really? Are we prepared to stand up and fight for the right of self-determination for ourselves and for each other, let alone for our friends and allies around the world? Right now, it seems doubtful.

In any event, assuming that we are in fact prepared to fight, the first thing that we must do is to agree that China, as led by the Chinese Communist Party, is infinitely more of a threat to the American way of life than is either Democratic Wokeness or Republican Magaism.

Then, our elected Democratic and Republican senators and representatives must come together to pass a series of bills to accomplish two goals: to put an end to the most egregious actions that China predominantly but not exclusively has taken in this country by limiting the rights of foreign nationals, foreign companies, and foreign governments within the United States; and to commit to the active involvement of the U.S. government in subsidizing and otherwise facilitating American manufacturing and mining capabilities in support of critical industries.

To that end, we must:

  • Secure the southern border to prevent fentanyl smuggling into this country. This means the completion of the border wall, the installation of surveillance and detection equipment, and the expansion of the border patrol agency.
  • Prohibit foreign companies from owning land in proximity to domestic military installations. All lands currently owned by foreign companies must be sold back to the Federal government at fair market value.
  • Deport all foreign nationals operating on behalf of foreign governments within the United States who are engaged in the surveillance and extortion of their own citizens who reside in this country.
  • Prevent foreign students from taking part in advanced research at U.S. universities without full vetting, to include their social and political ties to their country of origin.
  • Prohibit foreign nationals from engaging in political activity while residing within the United States.
  • Subsidize the mining of critical rare-earth minerals within the United States, fast-tracking permitting requirements and waiving environmental regulations to the greatest extent practical.
  • Subsidize the development of industries and manufacturing capabilities necessary for domestic production of products required for energy production, pharmaceutical production, food production, tool & die manufacturing, and industrial/manufacturing equipment.
  • Protect critical infrastructure to mitigate damage that could be caused by the ongoing cyber-espionage activities of foreign adversaries.

In addition, the United States and its allies must learn from ongoing military conflicts and adjust its strategies to ensure that the defensive strategies, weapon systems, and consumables we have are adequate and appropriate for the future threats we may face. We must make the best use of the designs and production capabilities of each allied country. For example, Ukraine has superior battlefield drone technology, South Korea has superior ship-building capability, the United States has superior missile defense systems, etc. The existential threat that we all face requires that we work as a unified alliance to create a formidable deterrence. 

WE MUST UNDERSTAND OUR PRIMARY ADVERSARY

It is foolish and naïve for the United States to interpret the actions of other countries through the lens of our own values and beliefs, but that is what we seem to insist on doing. The United States is a young country, only 250 years old. Our values and beliefs are aspirational, full of emotion-driven assumptions about our inherent greatness. Our leadership of the free world was not earned because of our centuries of world experience, but instead became ours by default. An honest appraisal of our performance suggests that we have been too simplistic in our view of the world. 

China is a 2,500-year-old country, which makes our own history insignificant in comparison. China has never been a country that values self-determination, independent thought, and democracy. China has always been governed by dynasties, defined by powerful families that ruled for generations until defeated in battle by the next powerful family who would then establish its own dynasty. The Chinese dynasties kept their rule through the ruthless use of power. 

China has not changed. The Chinese Communist Party is simply another dynasty. Mao Zedong was the great leader of the CCP-Mao dynasty. Xi Jinping is the great leader of the current CCP-Jinping dynasty. It would appear that Xi Jinping views the United States as weak-minded and ignorant, a failing dynasty that out of necessity must be overthrown for the CCP-Jinping dynasty to prevail.

The United States urgently needs to understand the significance of Chinese political history in order to fully understand the threat that China poses.

We must appreciate China’s ability to take advantage of the openness of our country and the freedoms inherent in our way of life. China must view these as foolish weaknesses and vulnerabilities, and they have been perfectly willing to exploit our weaknesses and vulnerabilities over a very long period of time. 

China is not our friend or our competitor. China is our adversary, an adversary that has ten times the strategic experience, and four times the population. China means to do us harm. China will negotiate in bad faith. China will sign treaties and agreements that it has no intention of abiding to. China will lie about its intentions. This is all strategic warfare, and this is all part of China’s history.

WE MUST ALWAYS SEEK PEACE

The United States has experienced a great deal of conflict in its 250-year history. First, it was to break free of British tyranny and then to stay free from it. Next, it was to aggressively realize its “manifest destiny” to extend its borders from sea to sea at the expense of native Americans and Mexicans. Next, it was to eliminate slavery through a brutal and bloody civil war. Next, it was to further our geopolitical interests and protect American business by engaging in a war with Spain.

But since then, all of the conflicts the United States has been a party to have been in defense of self-determination, one way or another. Along the way, the United States has made many bad decisions that have led to accusations of imperialism. Too many covert operations, too many attempts at regime change and forced democracy, too many innocents killed who happened to be in the way.

After 75 years of trying to establish and maintain a peaceful world order, the United States is seeing its position as the world’s premier superpower being challenged and diminished. If one is honest about the past 75 years, the United States has expended great wealth and lost many lives in this endeavor to achieve world order, and has not benefited in any lasting way. No additional territory has been won, no colonies have been created, no foreign populations have been subjugated, no wealth has been stolen.

There are those who would attempt to tarnish, minimize and dismiss the history of the United States and what it has accomplished. These people are entitled to their opinion, but we are also entitled to question their credibility and their motivation in doing so. On the whole, particularly in the past 75 years, the United States has acted a selfless, principled manner, and has shared whatever benefits it has received with the rest of the world.

The world is entering a difficult time where the dark forces of despotism, fascism, religious fanaticism, dictatorial and imperial rule seem to be becoming stronger. More and better weapons are being obtained by countries who seek to destroy the peaceful world order that they disparagingly dismiss as a “western construct”. These countries offer chaos and violence and subrogation as the alternative. 

There are profound challenges that face the world right now that this dark alternative future will only make worse. Global warming, famine, pestilence, oceanic flooding, an increasingly volatile climate, widespread pollution – only a peaceful world order can successfully confront these challenges. All of the countries of the world must be involved and working cooperatively if these threats to our common existence are to be addressed.

This is why it is so important that the United States reject any calls to retreat from international involvement. Instead, the United States should expand its efforts to seek peace. Instead of focusing on conflict after conflict after conflict, every attempt should be made to speak instead of the shared challenges that all peoples face, and to make every attempt to bring the world together to address them. Much more time should be spent speaking of our commonalties instead of our differences.

Of course, there will be those countries who would attempt to gain advantage from such an approach and act in a self-serving manner at the expense of all others. There should be no hesitation to call out these countries and their behavior when it threatens our collective future, and to counter their behavior whenever possible. 

And, above all, we must never forget the importance of peace through strength.

WE MUST LEAD BY EXAMPLE

If we are to be seen as a great country, we must act like a great country. We are not a great country at the moment. There are few metrics where the United States is considered to be the best. And yet, we persist in believing that we are better than we are. Until we can recognize our failings as a nation and as a people, we will never regain the greatness that we once had. 

If we are so great, then why does one third of our people and one of our major political parties have as their slogan “Make America Great Again?”. 

If we are so great, then why are we systematically deporting our citizens who have lived here for decades as peaceful contributors to our society because of fear and hatred and resentment?

If we are so great, then why is our murder rate so high, our depression rate so high, our suicide rate so high, our infant mortality rate so high, our poverty rate so high, our level of substance abuse so high?

If we are so great, then why do our children score so low on the worldwide educational scale?

If we are so great, then why is our life expectancy dropping, our happiness level dropping, our confidence in our elected leaders dropping?

If we are so great, then why does poll after poll consistently show that a majority of Americans think that the country is going in the wrong direction?

Perhaps the simplest answer to all these questions is that we are no longer a great nation. 

Given the divisions within our society, given the income inequities that we seem so willing to accept, given the immoral and unethical behavior of so many of us including many of our elected leaders and even Supreme Court judges, given the level of greed and corruption that exists throughout our society, clearly our greatness as a nation is now in the past. 

Of course this can all change, if that is what we want. But we must be committed, we must be resolved, we must be resolute. In the end, we will only get what we fight for, not what we wish for.

It is not enough to blame others and yet do nothing ourselves. It is not enough to express concern and disappointment for the way things are but to not act to make things better, even if only on a personal level. It is not enough to leave the leading to the leaders when they clearly have no idea in which direction to go. 

We must all be leaders. We must all speak up for one another. We must wake up with the intention of doing what is right and what is good every moment of every hour of every day. We must learn to be disciplined and to be strong-willed, and to reject what we all know to be wrong.

We do this long enough, and people will notice. Some will understand, and then they too will begin to speak up and do what is right and good, making such action a part of their lives. More people will notice, more will understand, more will take on the responsibility of being a positive influence in their own lives and in the lives of others, and so on until all become aware of what needs to be done and begin to do it.

Americans need to understand that it is the people who make a country great, not the other way around.

The more we fight, the more we resent, the more we blame, the more we hate – the less of a people we become, and the less our country becomes as well.

It is up to we the people to lead by example. The nation will follow. Then, perhaps the world will as well.

The Unpredictability of Life

I have just caught up on my blog postings from the past few years, as well as some older blogs that were never posted previously. This is why there are so many postings in a few day’s time.

I’ve included the original dates that the blogs were created to add context and timeframe, because much of what I wrote about has come true. It is important, at least to me, to document the undeniable fact that I have been much more perceptive than most of the well-known professional commentators and podcasters who, let’s face it, have no idea what they are talking about.

So, as by way of an explanation, I had to change my priorities over the past few years. I’ve been a caregiver of sorts for my wife, who fought like hell for nearly two years to avoid starting dialysis. At the same time she endured a year of chemotherapy for multiple myeloma. I had to watch as she slowly deteriorated, her kidneys becoming more and more unable to filter her blood, balance out her blood chemistry, and regulate the retained fluid in her body. In the end, she had no life energy left.

Thankfully, pretty much at the last moment, she agreed to get a second opinion, which confirmed that her choice was either to begin dialysis or suffer certain death by multiple organ failure. She chose to begin dialysis, which she calls her part-time job, and her life energy has come back. Dialysis is truly a life-affirming treatment. And, her multiple myeloma continues to be in remission.

I am not some sort of saint who has sacrificed their own life to help their spouse out in a time of need. Many people have done the same. This is what you do if you believe in your marriage vows. Unlike many, our story seems to have a happy ending, with many more years of shared life experiences to come. I feel fortunate for that. Not all stories have a happy ending.

This just illustrates the unpredictability of life.

Now, thankfully, I have the time to refocus my energies back to my blogging, and to my attempts to find some way to contribute to the discussions regarding our society, our politics, and life in general.

My challenge is to find a means to reach a mainstream audience. My efforts in submitting essays to the print media have proven to be an epic failure. Trying to connect with well-known commentators and podcasters is proving difficult, as it seems that there is no means of communicating with them other than through their handlers and publicists. I am not interested in an autograph or buying merchandise. I am interested in an exchange of ideas. How quaint is that?

I would encourage everyone to read all my old blogs, as I think that I have a great deal to contribute. Frankly, as I read through my more recent blogs as I was posting them, I was struck by how right I have been. My writing seems to have improved as well.

If only I was more photogenic!

Vengeance Is Mine, Sayeth the Supreme Court (October 2020)

The current discussion between conservative vs. liberal judges really misses the point. The discussion should really be about the Old Testament vs. The New Testament, a vengeful and punitive God vs. a compassionate and accepting God.

Once Amy Coney Barrett is confirmed and becomes a Supreme Court Justice, religious freedom, in the form of evangelical Christian religious belief, will become the law of the land in much of the country. This is because the separation of church and state will be established on a state-by-state basis.

Just to review, the U.S. Constitution is not very long and not very detail-oriented.

The Constitution lays out a very basic structure of our government. The passage of time and the needs of the people have enriched this basic structure into the complex system that it is today, the influences of bureaucracy and special interests not withstanding.

The U.S. Constitution consists of 7 Articles that lay out the basic structure of our government – the establishment of three branches and the responsibilities of each branch, and discusses the balance between the Federal and State governments.

The U.S. Constitution also includes 27 Amendments that primarily serve to expand upon the rights of the people.

That’s it.

The U.S. Constitution does not specifically address the following:

  • The rights of women to control their own reproductive condition;
  • The rights of gay, lesbian and transsexual people to be protected from discrimination or prosecution;
  • The rights of older workers to be protected from discrimination;
  • The rights of workers to unionize and negotiate for a fair wage and safe working conditions;
  • The rights of followers of non-Christian religions to have their beliefs acknowledged and respected on an equal basis to Christianity;
  • The rights of the economically disadvantaged, the unlucky, and the unfortunate to have any protection from becoming destitute.
  • The rights of the people to breathe clean air and drink clean water, and not be poisoned by contaminated soil;
  • The rights of the people to protect public lands from being ravaged by industry for profit;
  • The rights of the people to have access to affordable health care;
  • The rights of the people to establish control over the type and quantity of arms that can be owned by private citizens, or to control when or where arms can be taken or when they can be used;
  • The rights of the people to choose their own leaders instead of having the very rich and corporate interests determine who will establish the laws that define our society.

What is going to happen once Amy Coney Barrett is confirmed is that the Supreme Court will favor state’s rights over federal rights in a strict, literal reading of the U.S. Constitution, in accordance with the concept of judicial restraint.

When it comes to questions concerning individual behavior, the beliefs of the evangelical Christian movement will become the law of the land in many states where evangelical Christians exert influence beyond their numbers. The concept of freedom of religion will be used to justify discrimination against anyone who does not believe in, and live in accordance with evangelical Christian dogma.

Unfortunately, evangelical Christians may preach the New Testament teachings of love and acceptance of others, but they follow the Old Testament teachings of vengeance and punishment of any who do not conform.

The Supreme Court majority will righteously feel that they have done their duty in adhering to a literal reading of the U.S. Constitution, and they will accept no responsibility for the further division of our country that they will have caused.

This is what the confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett will mean.

This is why adding seats to the Supreme Court may ultimately be necessary. There has to be a healthy balance between judicial restraint, where laws and acts of the legislative branch are upheld unless obviously unconstitutional, and a more enlightened approach – unfortunately referred to as judicial activism – where laws and acts of the legislative branch must also be judged on the basis of their effect on society, whether or not they are in the best interests of the people.

Some may argue that this is nothing more than legislation from the bench, but is this not simply judgement performed at a higher level, and a recognition that the U.S. has evolved in 230 years in ways that our founding fathers could never have anticipated.?

A Pox on Both Our Houses (September 2020)

The hyperbolic nature of this upcoming election is overheated to the point of insanity. If we are to believe the press and the pundits, this election will determine the end of our country and perhaps the world as we know it, no matter who is elected.

In reality, after the election life will go on much the same as before, although many of us will be deeply disappointed, depressed, and distrustful. Our country will become increasingly damaged from continued division and distrust.

For the Democrats, the worst-case scenario is that Donald Trump will be re-elected, the Senate majority will be retained by the Republicans, and all four of Donald Trump’s eldest children will be nominated and confirmed for cabinet-level positions.

Beyond that, the Democrats’ worst-case scenario includes concerns that:

  • The replacement Supreme Court Justice nominated for Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s seat will be a reactionary conservative who will help to strike down Roe v. Wade and the Affordable Care Act, allow open-carry of semi-automatic handguns and assault-type rifles in all 50 states, allow any business to discriminate however they see fit based upon race, creed, religion, sexual orientation, country of origin, etc. based upon the concept of freedom of religion, and allow further control of our political system by the uber-rich and corporations by allowing unlimited expenditure of money based upon the concept of freedom of speech;
  • There will be further prosecution and incarceration of Democrats and Republicans alike who have investigated and/or questioned Donald Trump, the friends and associates of Donald Trump, or the Trump organization itself;
  • The Supreme Court will confirm the constitutionality of the widespread use of the National Guard and the military to keep order in all major cities in the United States in support of President Trump’s Law and Order doctrine;
  • There will be widespread commercial exploitation of Federal and Native American lands, the elimination of all regulations involving clean air and water, the elimination of the capital gains tax, and the privatization of Social Security and Medicare, all actions to benefit the business interests of the uber-wealthy and corporations;
  • The social safety net, including Medicaid, food stamps, and other federally-funded programs that primarily benefit the most vulnerable of Americans will be decimated through drastically reduced funding;
  • All undocumented people living in the United States will be deported, regardless of circumstance.

For the Republicans, the worst-case scenario is that Joe Biden will be elected President and the Democrats will gain control of the Senate, soon followed by Joe Biden being replaced by Kamala Harris as President, Ilhan Omar nominated and confirmed as Vice President, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez nominated and confirmed for a cabinet-level position.

Beyond that, the Republicans’ worst-case scenario includes concerns that:

  • The Supreme Court will be packed with additional Justices added to give control of the court back to the liberals/socialists, who would then reaffirm the nationwide right of women to obtain an abortion up until birth, approve a single-payer health system, support draconian limitations to the Second Amendment including confiscation of certain types of weapons, and extend affirmative action programs to include all sexual orientations as well as all undocumented residents;
  • The Green New Deal will be instituted, including the elimination of fracking, the elimination of all fossil fuels and nuclear power, the institution of a carbon tax, restrictions on air travel and the eating of meat, and payment of reparations to all minorities to make up for centuries of white privilege;
  • There will be acceptance of a world government that supersedes the authority of the Federal government, essentially allowing China to become the dominant political and military power;
  • The borders will be opened, resulting in uncontrolled entry of non-white, non-English speaking, criminally-inclined, unskilled, unhealthy immigrants into the country, who will then become immediately eligible for government assistance for food, clothing, shelter, medical needs and education, including preferential treatment for employment and other benefits at the expense of our own citizens who are not already covered by expanded affirmative action programs;
  • There will be taxation/confiscation of all private wealth and property owned by the upper 1%, major industries will be nationalized, and wealth will be redistributed in accordance with Marxist principles;
  • There will be restrictions on Christian religious freedom in favor of the expansion of Islamic values.

These are both pretty striking worst-case scenarios, and I think that concern from both sides of the political spectrum is warranted because all of these ideas have been proposed at one time or another. It is going to be up to the Problem-Solvers Caucus and like-minded rational people to work through this insanity.

God help us.

Arrogance of the Young, Obstinance of the Old, Ignorance of the Many (June, 2020)

One of the signs of a healthy skeptic is the willingness to let your opinions evolve as you encounter new facts or ways of looking at things that make more sense than what you were originally thinking. After all, who would want to be wrong when instead they could be right?

Too many, it seems.

It would appear that very few people are interested in living a life of intellectual curiosity and growth. For many, the effort to become wiser and more knowledgeable over time is not worth the effort or attention. They would prefer to let someone else tell them what to think. Ignorance becomes an accepted state of being, a comfortable numbness that allows people to accept the pain and suffering of others, overlook the inequities and inequalities of our society, and justify their lack of compassion and empathy. Add to this the self-interest that motivates many people and the widespread distrust of science and research, and the result can be seen all around us – divided, manipulated, angry and confused.

When you are young and not yet immersed in a life of responsibility, it is easier to see the world as it is, to see the pain, the suffering, the inequity, the inequality. It is easier to feel angry with the world and to want to bring about changes to address the wrongs that you see. There is a nobility and purity to this that should be acknowledged and appreciated. The issues identified and concerns voiced by the young are very real and we would all be better off if we used this as a basis for our actions as a society.

However, there is an arrogance and impatience of the young that comes with having limited life experience and no sense of historical perspective. Societies are complicated and interconnected, and the revolutionary demands for immediate change voiced by the young are frightening and disruptive to most everyone else. Society is set up for evolutionary change, a little at a time. This refusal to consider the needs and rights of others becomes self-defeating because it is rightfully seen as a threat. Moderate voices are not listened to during a revolution. What is heard are the extreme voices, the voices of anger and violence and anarchy. What is seen is the destruction and loss of civility and order. The validity and importance of the issues and concerns of the young become ignored and forgotten, and we all lose because of it.

When you are old and full of life experience, it is harder to see the world as it could be. Every change brings with it the need to adapt and grow, and it can be easier to just hold on to the familiar instead of changing with the times. There is a wearing down of the mind and body that happens to us all as we grow older. There can be a loss of creativity and imagination, accompanied by cognitive and sensory decline. The old can develop a tendency to reflect too much on the past and thereby miss out on the here and now.

There is an obstinance of the old that comes from the inertia of life, and from their unwillingness to acknowledge the effects and limitations of becoming older. Societies continue to change and evolve, and it is easier for society to focus on the new ways and ignore the lessons of the past. The life experience of the old is a valuable resource for the young if they would listen to it. The young can benefit from the perspective of the old, not because of what has happened in the past, but more so as to develop a better perspective and understanding of the present.

This obstinance of the old is of concern right now with so many of our leaders having reached an age where they have lost perspective and are unable to adapt and grow, preferring instead to cling to power and pettiness instead of stepping aside and allowing others to lead. Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell come to mind. If they are unwilling to gracefully step down, then the harsh and humiliating reality is that they must be stripped of their leadership positions so that more reasonable minds can prevail.

When you are neither young nor old, it is ignorance that becomes the issue. The young can be forgiven their arrogance, and the old can be forgiven their obstinance, but the many cannot be forgiven their ignorance.

The definition of ignorance is a lack of knowledge or understanding, but the root of ignorance is a willingness to ignore. The reality of this world is that there is a great deal of pain, suffering, injustice, and sadness all around us. It is easier to act as if none of this exists, or to decide that those who experience these things must have brought it upon themselves. Ignorance is simply a way to deny reality, to avoid thinking about things, and to never have to act to make things better.

The opposite of ignorance is enlightenment. To some, enlightenment is something spiritual and mystical that leads to a higher plane of consciousness, whatever that means. Enlightenment, simply put, means to have the personal courage to see what is real in life, to be willing to consider different ways of thinking, and to act in accordance with a code of personal values that hopefully reflects a sense of our shared human condition.

A little more enlightenment and a little less ignorance would go a long way towards addressing many of the problems that we experience on both a personal level and as a society.

The Dems Need A Tough Guy (Early 2019)

One only needs to look over the list of two dozen or so Democrats who are considering running for president in 2020 to come to one simple conclusion – most of these possible candidates aren’t qualified to be president.

First of all, this idea that a young telegenic candidate with minimal experience in holding an elected office can be an effective president is absurd. We should have learned our lesson by now that presidents who don’t understand how the government works and how our two-party political structure affects just about everything will not be successful unless and until they figure this out, and who knows how long this could take/ It makes sense that any serious candidate for president should have been a representative, a senator, and possibly a cabinet member so that they could acquire the type of experience that could serve as a solid foundation for their presidency.

Second of all, this idea that a candidate with a limited focus on a few issues can be an effective president is, simply put, wrong. Not only does an effective president have to have command of many domestic issues, but must also have command of many foreign issues as well. And having command means more than just issue knowledge, but it means having an understanding as to how all of these issues interrelate with one another. A wide range of understanding allows historical perspective, and would hopefully lead to a cohesive philosophy of governance and a clear direction and sense of purpose.

Third of all, this idea that the time has come for a special minority-type candidate to be president just because there has never been one of that group before is ridiculous. Any candidate who makes their ethniticity, race, sex, sexual orientation, faith, or other identifier a significant part of their candidacy alienates way too many people. We need the best candidate possible, not the most politically correct candidate. We need a candidate who we can all believe will represent all of us without bias.

Fourth of all, this idea that toughness is not a requirement to be president is dangerous. The world is full of angry, frustrated, aggressive people who do not have our best interests at heart. Appeasement, avoidance of confrontation, sacrifice – these types of responses to problems are weak-minded and ineffectual. The ability to stand firm and clear-headed in the face of a challenge or a threat is critical to being able to make the right decision under pressure. How can a candidate who has never experienced failure or learned to perserver in the face of difficulties and disappointments develop the toughness needed to be an effective president?

Finally, this idea that being progressive is a desirable label is problematic. Being progressive means making things better. But at the same time, being conservative means valuing what is still good and useful. All too often this progressive label is turned into a perjorative by people who are looking for an easy way to dismiss candidates that they may otherwise find worthwhile listening to. Conservative-leaning candidates receive the same treatment as well, although being conservative does not seem to be seen in as negative a light as is being progressive. Any candidate that prides themselves on being the most progressive does so at their own political peril.

Toughness tempered with empathy, experience tempered with an understanding of reality, that is what is needed. But it doesn’t look like that is what we will get.

Made In The USA? (April 2025)

I remember 25 years ago attending a Sunday service at a Unitarian church in southern Pennsylvania close to the Delaware border. This Unitarian church had a tradition of letting its congregation members speak about anything that was on their mind. A tastefully dressed woman stood up, introduced herself as a mid-level corporate manager, and proceeded to blame American workers for not being willing to accept the wages of overseas workers, thereby forcing corporate America to move its production overseas.

And so it began, this rejection of American workers by corporate America, which continues to this day.

All of our brilliant corporate minds reject the idea that America should manufacture anything. We have a service-based economy, they say. We need more AI, not the production of tangible products. We can’t compete with cheap overseas labor, so why even try?

I remember 50 years ago, when everything was still being made in this country. Shoes, clothing, appliances, sporting goods, cars, trucks, ships, farm equipment, machinery, pharmaceuticals – everything. 

So, what happened? 

First, the rise of trickle-down economics brought with it a massive reduction in income tax rates for the wealthy and corporations. The theory was that the wealthy would invest in businesses in the U.S., and this would result in a rise in wages and salaries for middle-class workers as some of this wealth given to the wealthy trickled down to them. The problem with this theory is that it was based upon the expectation that the wealthy would share their wealth. This never happens.

Second, the rise of the global economy resulted in foreign-made goods becoming more available to consumers and businesses in this country. Consumers liked the lower prices of foreign-made goods, were willing to accept lower quality, and did not make the connection that their preference for cheaper foreign-made goods was going to result in the loss of good-paying manufacturing jobs in this country. Cheaper foreign-made goods allowed American corporations to become more profitable by becoming importers instead of manufacturers, eliminating the overhead of wages, salaries, and factories.

Third, the entry of China into the global economy accelerated the destruction of the American industrial base. China created an export-based economy for itself and flooded the world with its cheap products. This allowed retailers such as Walmart to change how Americans shopped, in the process essentially destroying small-town businesses as Americans bought more and more cheap Chinese goods from brightly lit mega stores. American corporations continued to source more and more products from China, including machinery, chemicals, and minerals, laying the groundwork for this country’s economic vulnerability that has become increasingly evident. 

Fourth, there has been a creation of a new class of economic elites within the United States that has successfully transferred enormous wealth from the middle class to itself. This class of economic elites has benefited from very favorable tax laws and the ability to control our politicians to its benefit. It is no coincidence that this country has nearly a third of the world’s billionaires, that the top 1% of the wealthiest control nearly 1/3 of the wealth of this country, that corporate leaders make nearly 300 times more than their typical employee, and that dark money now dominates political campaign expenditures. 

Fifth, the rise in partisanship within our political system over the past 25 years has resulted in the creation of voting blocs within the two houses of Congress that prevent any serious discussion of issues from occurring and prevent compromise on legislation that would benefit the American people. It always seems that whenever an important issue is raised by a politician from either political party, the other party does its best to discredit the politician instead of acknowledging and discussing the issue. There has been no significant effort made to protect and promote the interests of the American people in decades.

It is no wonder that Americans distrust their own government and are less and less happy with their lives. 

Where do we go from here?

That is the question that we face as a nation. 

I am afraid that there will be no easy answers.

Trump The Impaler (March 2025)

April 30th will mark the 100th day of the Trump administration. On this day, the Trump administration and the Trump party, formerly known as the Republican party, will declare that this has been the most consequential first 100 days of any presidency ever anywhere. 

Given the extent that the Trump administration has disrupted so much of what Americans have grown accustomed to, they will probably be right.

Historians will certainly record that this first 100 days was the most damaging of any American presidency, but for the time being we are all spectators, victims, and participants in Donald Trump’s Project 2025 Tour of Vengeance. 

It is impossible to predict what this country and the world will look like at the end of the Trump presidency, but it is unlikely that America will be great again or the world safer again. 

It is a great gift to the Democratic Party that the Republican Party has only one voice, the voice of Trump. Once Trump is gone the MAGA movement will lose its focus and direction. The Republican Party will frantically try to sustain the Trump aura, but since there is only one Trump, this effort will certainly be doomed to fail. 

In remaking the Republican Party in his own image, Donald Trump has destroyed everything that once defined the Republican Party. The Republican Party will have to redefine itself, and this will take time.

It is becoming clear that the Trump administration favors the rich and powerful at the expense of the old, the crippled, the poor, and the middle class. The Trump administration wants to punish through imprisonment, impeachment, and deportation all those who have spoken out against him, and eliminate future dissent through threats, intimidation, and federal legal action. The Trump administration has no friends or allies, only transactional foes. Everyone is an enemy. No one deserves compassion, empathy, or due process.

These are not the core values of what the Republican Party used to represent. It should be relatively straightforward for the Democratic Party to redefine the Republican Party as the party of the rich and ruthless, the heartless, the hate-filled, the destroyer of hopes and dreams.

And yet, this is the Democratic Party that we are talking about. Donald Trump became the focus of the Democratic Party, and still is. The Democratic Party has no effective leadership, no shared vision, no message other than to criticize and demonize Donald Trump. The Democratic Party has to unify itself and then inspire the American people with a different vision for the future. Donald Trump has broken the Democratic Party as well.

Donald Trump won reelection for a reason – he was seen to be strong, decisive, confident, charismatic, unafraid of questions, and possessing a positive vision for the future that saw America becoming great again. And he was not Joe Biden or Kamala Harris.

The Democrats simply cannot accept this. The Democrats want to be the party of the caring, the compassionate, to be the champions of the strange, the weird, the agitators, the protesters, and to bask in the support of the celebrities, even if this means that they must ignore the moderate nature of the American people. This is not what the American people want. This is a losing proposition, but the Democrats appear to be willing to double down on it.   

The Democrats need to find a champion, a leader who is seen to be serious, strong, decisive, articulate, and confident. This champion must possess a commonsense vision for the future that embraces global alliances and rejects isolationism. This champion must be well-versed in geopolitics and military strategy, as well as being experienced in the art of passing legislation in a partisan environment. And, in order to be electable, this champion must be willing to accept the social values of the majority of the American people and not insist on a woke agenda.

None of the current rising stars of the Democratic Party and none of the traditional old-school political warhorses meet these criteria. The Democratic Party needs one of their established senators or representatives to commit to becoming its champion, its leader, not because of ego, but because of a sense of duty to the country. 

Having military experience and involvement in intelligence/defense/foreign relations committees would be important assets for the next Democratic leader. Such a background would reassure the many Americans who view Democrats as being socialist woke weaklings, showing that a Democrat can be strong and disciplined, someone to whom the leadership of this country can be entrusted. 

The Trump administration is showing what it means to be led by a strongman who continues to expand his fascist vision of an America that is unified by fear and lack of dissent. Anyone who does not believe that Donald Trump is a fascist should read the Wikipedia definition of fascism. 

From Wikipedia, …

“Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist political ideology and movement, characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation or race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy.” 

Quite clearly, Donald Trump is the very definition of a fascist: 

He is a dictatorial leader who has surrounded himself with people who have demonstrated their willingness to carry out his orders without question. 

He has threatened military action against Panama and Greenland, and he has declared economic war on allies and adversaries alike through worldwide tariffs. 

He has systematically threatened the free press, law firms, universities, judges, prosecutors, and governors to impose his will or his retribution. 

He has systematically removed inspector generals and as many other existing governmental controls that may oversee or limit his actions. 

He believes that the very rich should lead the country and receive an increasing share of the nation’s wealth, even if this means that the poor and the elderly, among many others, will receive less. 

He has eliminated hundreds of thousands of government positions and hundreds of millions of dollars in government expenditures without any pretense of having first carefully evaluated these actions other than to claim, without proof of merit, that they were either unnecessary, duplicative, wasteful, or fraudulent.

He has imposed economic tariffs on essentially all imported goods in order to correct what he believes has been decades of imbalanced trade with essentially all other countries. This will increase the price of energy, food, clothing, lumber, cars, drugs – the consumer goods that people need on a daily basis – but he has promised that any resulting economic pain will prove to be good for the country over time.

He has directed his government to find and deport as many illegal immigrants as possible, with the stated intention of concentrating on those who are criminals and gang members. However, the scope of this deportation effort now identifies as criminals anyone who is in this country illegally, regardless of family, history of employment, or contribution to community. This has become a needlessly cruel policy that is said to be in the best interests of American society.

He has referenced the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to justify the removal from this country, or refusal to readmit to this country, virtually anyone who has a legal basis to be in this country other than birthright citizens. This includes those with student visas, those who have work permits, those who hold green cards, those who are in the midst of legal efforts to remain in this country, and those who are naturalized citizens. This can and is being done without due process.

President Trump is unique among all American presidents with regards to the extent of his fascist tendencies. His ability to exert his will over the Republican majority in both houses of Congress, all of whom have taken an oath to uphold the Constitution first and foremost, is extraordinarily disturbing. Their unwillingness to question or debate any of his actions is profoundly disappointing. So is the blind allegiance of so many of his supporters.

Such is the power of a charismatic, unhinged fascist leader.

Donald Trump was not always a fascist, but losing to Joe Biden has broken Donald Trump and has unleashed his darkest instincts, instincts that revolve around absolute control, retribution, paranoia, and vengeance. Donald Trump is living in his own world right now, unhinged and without any limitations other than those imposed by the reality of the world that the rest of us live in. 

Unfortunately, this will all have to get worse before it gets better. An overwhelming majority of the American people will have to disapprove of Donald Trump before the congressional Republicans will be willing to speak out in disagreement, let alone pass legislation to undo some of his most excessive actions. 

Instead of being led by a unhinged fascist strongman, it would be far better to have a leader who is strong, but understands what it means to live in a democracy. 

This is a problem, because this leader needs to come from the Democratic Party, the party that represents nothing and stands for nothing. To say that the Democratic Party is currently held in low esteem by a vast majority of Americans is not an overstatement, it is a statement of fact.

DEI, critical race theory, trans rights, climate change, equity, celebrity endorsements – this country has moved beyond all that. The Democratic Party needs to as well. It cannot continue to allow the Republicans to define it in such a disparaging manner that in many parts of the country to identify as a Democrat is to be ostracized, ridiculed, and dismissed. 

Now is the time for the Democratic Party to put forth candidates who believe in making America great again, but also understand that moderation and common sense are the best ways to achieve inclusion, not through social engineering. If only the Democratic Party was prepared to offer Americans a better vision for the future of this country, it could win back the House and the Senate during the mid-term elections. 

It may be too soon to expect so much, given the chaos that exists within the Democratic Party, but all it would take is one person who is a true leader to emerge and inspire. Whoever you are, this country needs you.

Winter Is Coming (February 2025)

We are halfway through the first 100 days of the second Trump administration and there is a noticeable chill in the air, an uneasiness, a vague sense of something bad that is about to come.

First, the good news. No one is attempting to illegally enter this country anymore. Fentanyl and human trafficking are trending downward. 

And…that is it. Everything else is bad news. 

The Trump administration would like to believe that it is ushering in the Golden Age of America, but it is looking more and more that what they are doing will create a Dark Age of Chaos instead. 

I watched the televised first Cabinet meeting and was struck by how unqualified and unimpressive most of the cabinet members appeared to be. Clearly President Trump chose them for their loyalty and fealty to him first and foremost, not because they were among the best qualified people for the positions that they hold. In addition, the esteem and deference that everyone gave to Elon Musk was disappointing, as was the egotistical way in which Mr. Musk comported himself. 

I watched the televised meeting between President Trump and President Valisnsky during which President Trump and Vice-President Vance harshly criticized President Valinsky for advocating for his own country. President Trump grossly overstated the value of the military aid that the U.S. has provided Ukraine, and grossly understated the value of the military aid that the EU nations have provided Ukraine. The attempt to humiliate President Valinsky and make him grovel for more aid was an embarrassment to this country.

I watched the televised first speech by President Trump to the joint session of Congress and was very disappointed that President Trump was so dismissive of the Democratic Senators and Representatives, who represent nearly half of the citizens of this country. Of course, I felt that the behavior of many Democrats in attendance, together with the rebuttell speech gave by Representative XYZ, was a perfect reflection of the unfocused, undisciplined, and ineffective nature of the Democratic Party. 

We would do well to remember that Donald Trump was an egocentric TV celebrity who captured the attention of the American public until he lost interest in his own show when his ratings began to decline. We would do well to remember as well that he was a terrible businessman who declared bankruptcy five times, leaving financial disasters in his wake that other people were forced to clean up. We would do well to remember that his business empire is based primarily on golf clubs and renting out his name for use on properties owned by other people. 

Donald Trump’s entire career is based upon his brash charm, his aggressive deal-making, and his undeniable flare for self-promotion. He has created nothing beyond himself. That is who he is. 

Being President is Donald Trump’s greatest performance. Unfortunately, the presidency of the United States is not intended to be theater. It is a serious responsibility that requires forethought, strategic thinking, a sense of obligation to do right by the people of this country, and a historical awareness of the position of this country vis-s-vis the rest of the world. 

Donald Trump possesses none of these critical attributes. But he has all the power of the Presidency to do as he wishes. The fact that he is creating a disaster for this country should come as no surprise to anyone who has an understanding of history and what happens when leaders have no limitations on their worst impulses.

It is still the case that President Trump has millions of followers who believe in everything that he says and support anything that he does. However, the more government employees that his administration fires, the more difficult it becomes to conduct the business of government. It becomes more likely that the actions of the Trump administration will begin to have a negative effect on the lives of the people who entrusted him with our democracy. 

Severe cuts to Medicaid, for example, will mean that millions of Americans will no longer have affordable access to health care. The punitive tariffs against our three largest trading partners, followed by reciprocal tariffs against the remaining countries of the world, will result in higher prices for food and clothing, which will affect everyone except the wealthiest among us.

There is concern that the actions of the Trump administration will lead to a significant economic downturn due to fewer exports of agricultural products, a slowdown in the housing industry due to higher imported lumber prices, and a reduced demand for cars and trucks due to tariff-driven higher prices.

The Trump administration has begun warning Americans to expect some pain before they see the benefits of this Golden Age of America. Congressional Republicans have begun stating that the true patriots of this country are willing to accept this pain. Is this not the opposite of what Donald Trump promised that his second term would bring?

It is entirely possible that by the end of the first 100 days of the Trump administration President Trump’s disapproval rating will reach an all-time low, but great damage will already have been done by then.

Perhaps it will finally become clear that Donald Trump was never the answer, that his greatness was only an illusion, that he really does not understand this democracy and the American people after all, that the demands of the office of President are beyond his capabilities. 

When this happens, we had better be prepared, because who knows what a desperate Donald Trump would be willing to do?

Could Donald Trump Be Right? (January 2025)

President Trump has been President for a week and is proceeding at lightning speed to restructure the U.S. government. President Trump actually started his administration weeks before his inauguration. His actions so far have been bold and decisive, often at the expense of the Congress and the Constitution. 

From his decision to pardon all indicted and all convicted people involved in the January 6th insurrection, to his decision to fire nearly all Inspector Generals from his government, and to his decision to eliminate all government positions related to DEI initiatives, President Trump has shown no respect for the legal system and due process and has shown no compassion for those whom he has fired. 

President Trump has exerted his will over the Republican members of Congress, who will almost certainly confirm without question every appointment that he makes, starting with his cabinet, regardless of the level of relevant experience of his appointees, any conflicts of interest they may have, or questionable past conduct or statements made.

In addition, President Trump has threatened allies and enemies alike with tariffs, annexations, and holy hell should they not accede to his demands.

It has been a week of weeks, and this is only the beginning.

President Trump insists that the American people have given him a mandate to change the country as he sees fit and is proceeding accordingly. He acts as if the checks and balances to presidential power as stated in the Constitution do not apply to him. President Trump controls the Congress, the legislative branch of the government. He acts in a manner that suggests he fully expects the Judicial branch of the government, i.e., the Supreme Court, to also fall in line.

There is an understandable concern that President Trump will exceed his constitutional authority unchecked and will engage in actions that threaten not just people who entered this country illegally, but those who are here legally, those who are naturalized citizens, those who want access to contraception and early-term abortion, even those who question the constitutionality of his actions or simply voice their disagreement with them.

This is certainly the potential downside to this new Trump administration, a ruthless control of society and a silencing of dissent. Many Trump supporters may be in favor of such measures, not understanding that these actions are in accordance with the type of Trump fascism that people were warning about leading up to this recent election. 

President Trump’s nominees to various senior positions in his cabinet reflect his intention to act with an iron fist. His nominees suggest that President Trump believes that it is necessary for him to have people in these positions who share his willingness to act in ways that ignore the Constitutional limits of executive authority. 

Of concern as well is President Trump’s ongoing purge of government employees, which is a confirmation of his need for retribution and unquestioning fealty. Many of these firings, such as those involving independent inspector generals, are of questionable merit even in light of his need for absolute control. At the very least, the extent and breadth of President Trump’s purge shows an absence of thoughtfulness and any concern about short-term pain or long-term consequences.

There are now comparisons being made detailing the similarity between the actions of the Trump administration and the Project 2025 manifesto, suggesting that President Trump mislead everyone when he denied having any knowledge of Project 2025. This pretty much confirms that President Trump will say whatever he needs to say in order to achieve his objective. So much for honesty.

 In any event, all of President Trump’s disruptive actions will be over by the end of the first 100 days of his presidency. At that point we will have a clearer picture of the degree to which the Republican-controlled legislative branch of the government intends to perform their constitutional responsibility as being a check and balance. 

Given its current commitment to supporting President Trump’s agenda without reservation or deliberation, it is unlikely that the Republican-controlled Senate and House will be anything other than a mindless rubber stamp.

It is unfortunate that President Trump has taken this sledgehammer-like approach to governance. It takes away from his perceptiveness in identifying the critical failings and weaknesses of our country, both domestically as well as internationally.

To begin with, the border security of this country has been severely weakened by the Biden administration’s policies. There are between one and two million dangerous illegal aliens in this country. They must be located and removed, which is happening now. 

Side Note: It would be best if there was complimentary legislation establishing a more robust working visa program so that critical work being performed by illegal immigrants was acknowledged and legalized. This is unlikely to happen in the current environment where the focus is on removing as many illegal immigrants as possible regardless of their personal and employment history in this country. The American economy will suffer from this short-sighted approach.

Next, the geopolitical security of this country has been weakened by this country’s complacency and vacillating approach to strategic threats around the world. This is not a world of love and sense of community. It is a world of transactional decisions and alliances. This country’s generosity, openness, and sense of responsibility/guilt has been used to manipulate our foreign policy and access our wealth. A hardnosed review and rebalancing of our foreign relations is long overdue.

Side Note: The threat of tariffs and sanctions to induce cooperation by other countries in the interest of achieving a rebalancing of our foreign relations is an entirely acceptable strategy as long as there is a clear, reasonable, and justifiable basis for our actions. It is a harsh and direct approach to changing the status que, but this country can no longer accept any agreements that place us at a strategic or economic disadvantage. 

Next, there is a need for strengthening the international rules-based order that has allowed most of the world to flourish despite widespread corruption in many countries. The United States has been seen as the leader of the free world since the end of World War II, and this is a role that must continue because there is no alternative. Diplomacy is certainly an important part of this effort, but having a strong military deterrence has become increasingly more important. The threats to international rules-based order are primarily aggressive in nature, ranging from terrorist activities to cyber-attacks to actual invasions.  All threats must be addressed in a timely, direct, and multi-national manner.

Side Note: The military industrial complex based in the Pentagon is currently unable to develop and procure the weapons that this country requires to sustain a strong military deterrence. This is due to a concentration of military production in a limited number of profit-driven corporations that have undo political influence, both in Congress and in the Pentagon itself. Instead of relying solely on domestic weapons technology and manufacturing capability, the technologies and manufacturing capabilities possessed by NATO, the Quad countries, South Korea and Israel should be incorporated into our defense planning.

Next, there may be an opportunity to reduce the Federal budget by eliminating unnecessary programs and redundant agencies, and by reimagining how services are being provided. In addition, procurement methods may be inefficient due to various restrictions and regulations. The creation of a cabinet level Department of Government Efficiency has the potential to identify this type of government waste, although it is unclear at this time to what extent it will be able to act independently of political bias and influence.

Side Note: The assumption has been made that the Federal Government is too large and has too many people. Considering that the number of Federal employees has stayed remarkably consistent over the past 40 years, excessive headcount is unlikely to be a significant cause of the growth of the Federal budget, and yet this seems to be a primary focus of DOGE. So too, the firing of so many inspector generals removes independent oversight and increases the likelihood of corrupt practices flourishing in government agencies due to the amount of money involved in grants, programs, and contracts. This would appear to have been a self-defeating measure.

Next, there are undoubtably regulations and permitting requirements that restrict more efficient business development and expansion instead of protecting the public interest. Whereas most regulations and requirements were established to address an immediate need, their effectiveness over time may have turned into an unnecessary bureaucratic nightmare. Periodic review of all regulations for relevance and continued need should be an integral part of the work done by every agency in every department throughout the entire Federal government. Unfortunately, this is the type of unglamorous work the value of which is not immediately apparent and therefore is likely to be left undone.

Side Note: In many instances, it is politically expedient and highly profitable to eliminate regulations that require the public interest to be considered and protected. Great care should be exercised in the elimination of regulations to ensure that these actions are in the public interest. However, given the number of extremely wealthy businessmen/investors who will hold high-level positions within the Trump administration, it should be expected that many regulations will be eliminated so as to allow the exploitation of the public interest by private business interests.

Next, the United States is the largest market for international trade, and has traditionally run a deficit with most countries, importing more than exporting. This country’s reliance on China as a primary trading partner has proven to be problematic due to their unfair, manipulative, and somewhat threatening practices. Encouraging the development of other sources for goods, services, and raw materials is a prudent approach. Restrictions and tariffs on Chinese imports is also a prudent approach to counteract their strategic, destabilizing efforts.

Side Note: It is unclear to what extent the trade deficit has a negative effect on the economy of the United States. In theory, a balance between imports and exports may very well be a preferred condition, but in practice what this would mean for the U.S. economy needs much more study. Imposing tariffs to address existing trade deficits without this in-depth study, as is being done with Canada and Mexico, may not result in the desired outcome of balanced trade, but is likely to result in a worsening of relations with these countries. This should matter to the Trump administration, but it does not appear to factor into their actions.

Next, this country needs to become more tolerant towards those who have different ways of looking at life. This applies to our own people, as well as to our relationships with other countries. 

Side Note: This is where President Trump has been and will continue to be an abject failure. He seems to be fundamentally unable to understand the concepts of tolerance and diplomacy. The difference between being a tough-minded leader and an intimidator-in-chief is lost on him. President Trump does not believe in thinking things through and considering the ramifications of his words and deeds before speaking and acting. He believes in his own infallibility and sees any questioning of his decisions to be evidence of disloyalty. “I and I alone can solve the problems of this country” is President Trump’s underlying conceit. It simply is not true.

So, could Donald Trump be right? 

Yes, in that he has identified a number of ways in which this country could improve itself from where it is today. 

However, in the first few weeks of his administration, President Trump has acted imperiously with complete disregard to the ramifications of his actions and is likely to have exceeded his constitutional authority. 

Whatever mandate President Trump believes he was given by the American people certainly did not extend to the removal of the inspector generals who monitor government departments for corruption and other forms of malfeasance. So too, it is doubtful that the carte blanche authority President Trump has given Elon Musk to eliminate major parts of the federal government without debate or discussion was anticipated by the more moderate Trump supporters.

In comparison to the weak and unfocused leadership of the Biden administration, it is refreshing and reassuring to many that President Trump is taking decisive action. There is a sense among many that whatever President Trump does must be good for the country and that his actions should not be questioned.

It should be clear by now that President Trump and his administration are intent on a wholesale transformation of this country in the spirit of Project 2025. Once the giddiness and euphoria has passed, and the reality of the Project 2025 vision begins to become clearer, it will be time to take a much closer look as to whether or not this is in the best interests of our nation. 

But that time is not today.